Home
Art
Sex
Self
Earth
Dance
Travel
Health
Fiction
People
Relationships
Transportation
Food and Drink
Submit!
Feedback
Advertise!
About the-vu
Index of Writers
Legal Disclaimer

 

 
    
  

You are here: the-vu> Health> Neohygiene_5_6

Neohygiene
Parts 5 and 6 of 10
By Dan Hall
Published September 2004

The followiing are excerpts from Dan Hall's new book, Neohygiene

Neohygiene (Part 5 of 10)

When people are diagnosed HIV-positive (a diagnosis that could happen to anyone due to the faultiness of the HIV test), the fear factor alone is enough to cause disease. Mind over body is a very powerful phenomenon, but I won’t get into that right now. Assuming your emotions don’t get the best of you if and when you are diagnosed positive for the human immunodeficiency virus (and even if they do), most doctors are going to start you out on a strict daily regimen of AIDS drugs. Often called the “AIDS cocktail,” this regimen can consist of taking up to 40 pills per day for the rest of your life.

One of the most common AIDS drugs is AZT, which is a very deadly drug in and of itself and is actually capable of creating the same symptoms associated with AIDS! Symptoms such as blood cell destruction, chronic fatigue, lactic acidosis, and even death can all be caused by the prolonged use of AZT. Initially, AZT was created as a cancer drug, long before anyone had ever heard of AIDS, but due to its high toxicity, it was pulled by its manufacturer and shelved, never to be used again. When AIDS became popular, AZT was put back into production.

The media wants us to believe that AZT was specifically designed to combat HIV, thus preventing the onset of full-blown AIDS, but this is a tremendous lie! AZT was created to cure cancer, and because it was so toxic, its use was suppressed. Now, it is used to treat AIDS, but the sad truth of this tale is that AZT actually causes the symptoms associated with AIDS. In numerous clinical studies, AIDS patients who did not take AZT actually lived longer and healthier lives than those who popped these deadly pills like candy.

Like all other AIDS drugs, AZT is a notoriously harmful drug that will kill you if taken over a prolonged period of time. It doesn’t matter if you’re going to develop AIDS or not. If you test HIV-positive and you’re put on AZT, you will develop AIDS, and you will die. And remember what I said before: the test for HIV is faulty. Due to how it is tested and the chances of a false positive, almost anyone can test positive for HIV. If you test positive, will you question the diagnosis and get a second, third, and fourth opinion, or will you blindly follow the medical establishment and take every drug they hand you in hopes that you won’t get sick?

Of course, HIV doesn’t even exist. The belief in viruses came about almost 40 years before the technology existed to see at the submicroscopic level using an electron microscope. Any first-year molecular biology student will tell you that electron microscopes are very poor instruments that produce black-and-white shadows of images on computer-printed electron micrographs that must be interpreted by trained professionals before anyone knows what they are. When you look at an electron micrograph, it’s not like looking at a snapshot; it’s like looking at black blobs on a white sheet of paper. Unless you’re told what you’re looking at, you have no idea what you’re seeing. News flash: Even the trained professionals were told what to look for at one time, so who’s to say they even know what they’re seeing?

Neohygiene (Part 6 of 10)

Back in the 1940s (after over 35 years of believing that viruses must exist), James Hillier manufactured the first useable transmission electron microscope—one that could see at the submicroscopic level. After studying the poor electron micrographs they produced, scientists finally agreed that they had found a virus. After all, the belief existed for almost 40 years; they would have looked pretty stupid if they didn’t find something. But did they really find viruses? Or did they just go on a modern-day witch hunt and accuse the first thing they saw of being a witch … er, I mean, virus?

You’ve got to know a little something about molecular biology to really understand the argument against the existence of viruses. I’ll briefly explain what has happened, but don’t worry if you don’t fully understand. I doubt there’s more than a handful of molecular biologists who fully understand everything they believe. Like I said before, it’s more a religion than a science. Anyway, right now in your body, you have billions upon billions of cells—muscle cells, tissue cells, blood cells, bone cells, and so forth. All of these cells work together to form you. But while you can live many, many years (perhaps a lot longer than you currently believe), your cells only live for weeks or months at a time.

After that, they undergo the process of cellular division. One cell splits into two cells, two into four, four into eight, etc. Cells can only divide so many times before they get kind of old, and then they die. Their progeny, of course, can go on forever. But cells do die. The process is known as apoptosis—a kind of cellular suicide. When this occurs to a cell, the cell dissipates inside the bloodstream and becomes a rather sloppy blob of genetic material and protein debris. Getting back to viruses, the definition for a virus is a genome wrapped in a protein sheath.

A genome is nothing more than genetic material, so if a dead cell is genetic material and protein debris, then wouldn’t it make sense that these materials could be misidentified on occasion as viruses? A genome wrapped in a protein sheath could easily be a dead cell or a virus. During the 1940s, scientists did not know that cells died and dissipated in the bloodstream. Instead of finding viruses, they found dead cells, and their witch hunt concluded with them believing that viruses were nonliving genomes wrapped in protein sheaths.

But scientists still believe in viruses. Don’t they? Sure they do, because as I have already mentioned, the germ theory of disease is rarely put to the test, and even when it is, any unwanted conclusions are written off as poor research. The germ theory is, for all intents and purposes, written in stone. It would be blasphemous to go against such a steadfast belief. But science still goes on. The medical establishment has learned about apoptosis—the death of a cell. And what’s interesting is that they have admitted on many occasions that dead cells can be misidentified as viruses. The two are so similar until it is difficult to tell them apart! Could it then be possible that a virus is nothing more than a dead cell?

Concerning viruses, there is much more to the story. Viruses are said to invade living cells in order to force reproduction. When living cells eat dead cells (as they do all the time in the bloodstream), it could easily appear as though a virus is entering into a living cell. When living cells eat, it is known as phagocytosis. The process of phagocytosis, then, has been misidentified as a virus entering a cell. Keep in mind that no one sees this process in live action. It must all be interpreted on a series of electron micrographs, which are computer- printed shadows of images on black-and-white paper. It takes experts to read these micrographs, and even the experts have admitted that they have mistaken dead cells for viruses on many occasions. Couldn’t they have also mistaken phagocytosis for a virus entering into a living cell?

For what it’s worth, viruses do not cause disease. They don’t even exist. Viral diseases such as smallpox, AIDS, HPS, the flu, and even the common cold are not caused by viruses, and are, therefore, not contagious. So, what causes smallpox? Smallpox supposedly does not occur anymore, because it was supposedly eradicated many years ago. Regardless, its symptoms are still around. We call these symptoms by other names now, such as chicken pox, German measles, etc. But are these symptoms really indicative of a disease?

What you’ve got to understand is that the body, while complex by design, is very simple in operation. When you take drugs, eat what you shouldn’t, drink, smoke, live without regards to health, take routine vaccinations, and stifle your symptoms with medications, your body has no choice but to find a way to get rid of all this toxic stuff you’ve been pumping into it. So, when it needs to, your body forces a detoxification to eliminate all of the toxins you have been consuming. What you normally consider disease is actually your body’s way of making you healthier!

Parts 7 through 10 will be published in future editions of the-vu. To purchase the book, click on the book jacket to the right.


Dan Hall Hall is a teacher and author living in Georgia. Visit him on
the Web at http://www.neohygiene.com.

You are here: the-vu> Health> Neohygiene_5_6

 
 
the-vu. The e-zine with a different point of view
© 2000-2007 the-vu.com All rights reserved. Don't copy it, forward it. Share the original.
Legal Disclaimer